zlacker

[return to "DEA authorized to conduct surveillance on protestors"]
1. arkadi+S5[view] [source] 2020-06-03 00:26:44
>>codeze+(OP)
Via Kim Zetter:

> If you're wondering why DEA and US Marshal's Service have been given authority to conduct covert surveillance of protestors, it's likely because they have planes outfitted with Dirtboxes - powerful stingray devices that collect data on phones from the air

https://twitter.com/KimZetter/status/1267969704259280896

◧◩
2. kevinm+jn[view] [source] 2020-06-03 03:18:01
>>arkadi+S5
This may explain why the DEA, but not why protestors, as opposed to looters
◧◩◪
3. koheri+tS2[view] [source] 2020-06-03 21:21:08
>>kevinm+jn
There are several concerning videos of people trying to trigger violence at protests. Here is one list I saw today...

https://old.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/gvmhh6/fbi_...

◧◩◪◨
4. NoSorr+gj3[view] [source] 2020-06-03 23:54:58
>>koheri+tS2
I find it unusual and upsetting that this comparison gets made so often.

On one side, you have the generally disorganized public which naturally includes the opportunistic, the provocative, the desperate. On the other, you have the police and the military, nominally organized with a largely uniform mission and code of conduct.

Bad behavior by the government is less excusable and also more threatening.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. koheri+9s3[view] [source] 2020-06-04 01:05:44
>>NoSorr+gj3
I don't think it's meaningful to try to compare them. Is police brutality worse - ok. It's not relevant to the investigation the FBI is looking into.

I also think there may be some suspicions that some violent instigators might be acting at the urging of a foreign government - which is the domain of the FBI.

I think it's reasonable to help them in that effort - while also condemning the police for their role.

The death of ONE MAN, George Floyd, caused mass outrage. If a foreign directed agent is able to instigate a similar tragedy, I think that's very very important to nail down.

[go to top]