zlacker

[return to "DEA authorized to conduct surveillance on protestors"]
1. jimbob+m1[view] [source] 2020-06-02 23:52:57
>>codeze+(OP)
Before it gets asked...

>The DEA is limited by statute to enforcing drug related federal crimes. But on Sunday, Timothy Shea, a former US Attorney and close confidant of Barr who was named acting administrator of the DEA last month, received approval from Associate Deputy Attorney General G. Bradley Weinsheimer to go beyond the agency’s mandate “to perform other law enforcement duties” that Barr may “deem appropriate.”

◧◩
2. pfunds+t2[view] [source] 2020-06-03 00:02:30
>>jimbob+m1
How can we repair a system that's been systematically corrupted over several years? As a systems engineer my instinct is to rebuild the system from the ground up. If only politics was that simple.
◧◩◪
3. munifi+y3[view] [source] 2020-06-03 00:08:18
>>pfunds+t2
The way we fix legacy software systems: By carefully refactoring it one step at a time and testing and monitoring to make sure our refactoring doesn't break stuff that's working correctly.

The big rewrite is always appealing but almost always doomed to failure. There is 200+ years of painfully learned lessons in the US legal code. If we throw it all out and start over, we'll have to re-learn all of those lessons one tragedy at a time.

◧◩◪◨
4. enrage+99[view] [source] 2020-06-03 00:52:37
>>munifi+y3
>>The way we fix legacy software systems: By carefully refactoring it one step at a time and testing and monitoring to make sure our refactoring doesn't break stuff that's working correctly.

We no longer have the time for a slow approach where we make small changes and test and see. The system we have is not functioning, period, and end-users are protesting in the tens of thousands across all major cities in the country.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. runawa+Uq[view] [source] 2020-06-03 04:01:15
>>enrage+99
We don’t have the capacity or runway to rebuild from scratch either.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. kbenso+Xu[view] [source] 2020-06-03 04:42:07
>>runawa+Uq
Guess it's time to move fast and break things. I hope we don't break anything too important...
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Red_Le+6X1[view] [source] 2020-06-03 16:36:14
>>kbenso+Xu
Like healthcare? Privacy? Freedom from enslavement? Right to trial by a court of peers? A level footing between apenniless person and a billionaire? Crumbling infrastructure? Toxic water and food? Freedom from persecution?

We've been moving slow and pulling up the ladders behind us for hundreds of years. Things only trickle down when there's profit. That needs to change. These protests are exposing that game.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. kbenso+uT2[view] [source] 2020-06-03 21:26:32
>>Red_Le+6X1
I'm pretty sure you've imposed your own assumptions on what I meant when I said that.

That said, if all you see are the problems, it's easy to think there's no downside. It's entirely possible for other aspects of our society to get worse as we focus on those items. It's also possible for those aspects to get worse as we fail to make any meaningful change on the items we focus on, and eventually fail.

Assuming only positives can come from change is very dangerous. That doesn't mean we shouldn't attempt things anyways, but we should do so with eyes wide open, and not delusional as to the possible outcomes.

[go to top]