zlacker

[return to "Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access to military-style gear"]
1. Shivet+yh[view] [source] 2020-06-02 17:18:51
>>miles+(OP)
The equipment issue isn't going to solve anything, this is just lip service to the real problem. Police Unions have effectively created a system by which officers are nearly immune from prosecution and even if successfully prosecuted their record cannot travel with them in many cases.

Now one fix that removing some of the equipment will do will reduce the amount of psychological impact it has on those wielding it, as in reduce the Rambo effect. The idea of attaching military style equipment to the current problems is only for political purposes, they needed to blame Trump for the violence.

However in the end, there are few alternatives to fixing the police and their application and misapplication of force

1) Restrict conditions that can be placed in union negotiated contracts regarding officer behavior, culpability, and indemnification.

2) If not 1) then make it illegal for the unions to exist with regards to any public servant who is armed

3) civilian oversight boards that are veto proof against the police they monitor. Not only would they review incidents which are questionable they would have to involved in any use of concentrated force to include no knock warrants; something which should be illegal except in the most incredible cases.

4) holding elected and appointed officials of the localities, city, county, or state, accountable for the harm caused by their police forces.

◧◩
2. jeffbe+Cj[view] [source] 2020-06-02 17:30:19
>>Shivet+yh
Changing the inventory will reduce the appeal of police work for psycho assholes who fantasize about shooting protesters. Special weapons and vehicles should be reserved for centralized, specialized police forces who are called out when needed, if ever. Most cops should be issued a radio and a bicycle, so you attract people who want to look like [1] instead of [2].

1: https://files.kstatecollegian.com/2014/08/08.27.14.BikeCop.G...

2: https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c1200x675-w1200-q8...

◧◩◪
3. nds432+Yz[view] [source] 2020-06-02 18:46:33
>>jeffbe+Cj
How do you engender an idea of a UK/Canada-type cop in a country where there are more guns than people? I assume cops here are trained to see all citizens as armed threats, which systematically produces cops who are always on edge and ready to kill.

The whole thing feels like a deeper problem than just training cops to be nicer.

◧◩◪◨
4. tsss+5I[view] [source] 2020-06-02 19:24:58
>>nds432+Yz
Being a cop is actually a very safe job. I'd bet that your chance of being shot as a cashier at subway is higher than as a cop.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. jeffbe+eM[view] [source] 2020-06-02 19:40:58
>>tsss+5I
Here's a list of occupations that are more dangerous than police officer. https://cms.qz.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/the_deadliest_...
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. banana+aj1[view] [source] 2020-06-02 22:49:20
>>jeffbe+eM
This is an excellent example of lying with statistics.

Of course police deaths are low across all police everywhere. The aggregate death statistics are meaningless.

Pull up a stat comparing deaths of cops only in downtown Chicago or Detroit or how about Minneapolis and then it will be more meaningful

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. TomSwi+Nt2[view] [source] 2020-06-03 10:37:18
>>banana+aj1
The reason you don't pull up those statistics is that they in fact completely contradict your claims.

You might ask yourself why you feel the need to make things up?

[go to top]