zlacker

[return to "Police attacks against journalists across the U.S. since May 28"]
1. simonw+M4[view] [source] 2020-06-02 18:21:20
>>laurex+(OP)
Since this is happening simultaneously in many different cities around the country, I have to wonder if there are private Facebook or WhatsApp or Signal groups where police members are talking about this trend. I'd very much like to see those conversations.
◧◩
2. jonluc+c6[view] [source] 2020-06-02 18:27:32
>>simonw+M4
It's possible, but also, there's precedent from 2014 in Ferguson. Several members of credentialed media were arrested and assaulted to various degrees. Pretty much nothing happened by way of punishment other than a settlement from the DoJ saying they couldn't kettle people anymore, enforced by what is now Barr's department.

Any officer paying attention would know you won't be punished unless you act particularly egregiously like the one officer in Louisville reassigned to desk duty (big whoop). Add on the amount of animosity stoked by the president toward media for the past 4-5 years, and it really doesn't take a simultaneously coordinated effort to have this outcome.

◧◩◪
3. gedy+Dd[view] [source] 2020-06-02 18:57:19
>>jonluc+c6
> you won't be punished unless you act particularly egregiously like the one officer in Louisville reassigned to desk duty (big whoop)

Isn't this honestly largely due to the police union rules and contacts, which (unions) are a key part of leftist labor relations?

◧◩◪◨
4. TheOth+6j[view] [source] 2020-06-02 19:23:43
>>gedy+Dd
Don't you think it's curious that only the police are allowed to have these super-effective unions with literal stay-out-of-jail clauses in their contracts - while Amazon workers who want proper toilet breaks will simply be fired?

Does that answer your question?

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. rhino3+Iw[view] [source] 2020-06-02 20:29:22
>>TheOth+6j
That's about public v. private unions, not really about cops v. everyone else.

Companies can fairly easily break a union. After call, why does Ford need a Detroit plant when they can use Mexico.

But governments are lead by politicians who get money from unions. Union supports leader, leader pays union, union supports leader. No incentive to keep costs down at all. It's actually better for politicians to have strong public unions.

Teachers unions make it pretty much impossible to fire someone. You pretty much need to molest a child in places with a union (after you make tenure).

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. lotsof+CM1[view] [source] 2020-06-03 07:10:07
>>rhino3+Iw
>But governments are lead by politicians who get money from unions. Union supports leader, leader pays union, union supports leader. No incentive to keep costs down at all.

Hence the US states' and cities' unfunded pension debt crisis. Only solution to it in democracies is for non government employees to actively participate in local elections.

[go to top]