zlacker

[return to "DEA authorized to conduct surveillance on protestors"]
1. jimbob+m1[view] [source] 2020-06-02 23:52:57
>>codeze+(OP)
Before it gets asked...

>The DEA is limited by statute to enforcing drug related federal crimes. But on Sunday, Timothy Shea, a former US Attorney and close confidant of Barr who was named acting administrator of the DEA last month, received approval from Associate Deputy Attorney General G. Bradley Weinsheimer to go beyond the agency’s mandate “to perform other law enforcement duties” that Barr may “deem appropriate.”

◧◩
2. gbrown+w4[view] [source] 2020-06-03 00:14:28
>>jimbob+m1
This is so completely fucked. I always worry about sounding hyperbolic, but I really do wonder these days if we’re living through the last days of the American republic.
◧◩◪
3. wetmor+B6[view] [source] 2020-06-03 00:32:45
>>gbrown+w4
I feel the same way a lot recently and I would love for someone to tell me why I'm wrong.
◧◩◪◨
4. jediea+hb[view] [source] 2020-06-03 01:09:40
>>wetmor+B6
Because every other country in the world has a vested interest in keeping the USD stable as a currency, which would mean that they'd help keep the country up if needed (whether it's good or not that a civil revolt is extremely difficult here is up to you).

The entire world's economy, as well as many countries political configurations, rely on the United States existing. I doubt it's going anywhere, but hopefully reform might actually happen this time.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ardy42+LB[view] [source] 2020-06-03 05:40:51
>>jediea+hb
>>> This is so completely fucked. I always worry about sounding hyperbolic, but I really do wonder these days if we’re living through the last days of the American republic.

>> I feel the same way a lot recently and I would love for someone to tell me why I'm wrong.

> Because every other country in the world has a vested interest in keeping the USD stable as a currency, which would mean that they'd help keep the country up if needed

You're answering the wrong question. The American republic isn't primarily an economic system, it's a political and social one. It can become completely fucked in so many ways without disrupting the currency too badly too quickly.

I know it will be little consolation to me to have the currency remain stable while things descend into pseudo-democratic authoritarianism.

[go to top]