zlacker

[return to "White nationalist group posing as antifa called for violence on Twitter"]
1. bruceb+K5[view] [source] 2020-06-02 03:11:16
>>aspenm+(OP)
Blaming the boogy man of White Nationalists, Russia, or outside outside agitators is a way to shift blame by politicians and an easy scapegoat. Amusingly the governor of Minnesota, and a big city MN mayor blamed vandalism & lootingrioters as being the work of people who were all from out of state, thereby parroting Trump's same line (or he theirs).

They (not Trump of course) had to walk it back when it turned out not to be true.

Is there some outside groups posing as others, possibly, but to blame a majority of problems on them is just BS.

◧◩
2. epakai+ho[view] [source] 2020-06-02 06:19:02
>>bruceb+K5
The problem is antifa has become the new boogy man for the GOP, and they've been pushing this narrative extremely hard. It's apparent they've identified their enemy, but this approach has me worried that "First they came for the antifa..." might not be far off.

I see a lot of mischaracterization of what is a category, not a group. From what I can tell antifa is anti-fascism, and somewhat characterized by people willing to take direct action.

◧◩◪
3. roenxi+lw[view] [source] 2020-06-02 07:38:06
>>epakai+ho
The experience with -ism words like socialism, communism, capitalism, libertarianism, etc, is that it is very hard to rally a group together that agrees on an actual definition of what they mean.

So when you say 'From what I can tell antifa is anti-fascism' - what does that mean? America doesn't have any serious fascist groups - from what I can tell the ruling powers are decidedly corporatist and the first alternative philosophy seems to be light/moderate socialism. Second is maybe libertarianism.

So who/what do you think the anti-fascists are opposing, and what would they espouse if they ever decide there are no fascists for them to define themselves against?

◧◩◪◨
4. akisel+sy[view] [source] 2020-06-02 07:59:39
>>roenxi+lw
> America doesn't have any serious fascist groups - from what I can tell the ruling powers are decidedly corporatist and the first alternative philosophy seems to be light/moderate socialism.

Corporatism was inseparable from fascism in Italy and Germany. The exploitation of the profit motive is one of the primary reasons that so many people overlooked the atrocities.

Fascism is the reason so many companies like IBM, Hugo Boss, L'Oreal, Koch Industries, Audi, Porsche, Adidas, BMW, and countless other extant corporations have dark histories from supporting the German extermination camps to utilizing their slave labor to build their products.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. depend+tF[view] [source] 2020-06-02 09:17:56
>>akisel+sy
> Corporatism was inseparable from fascism in Italy and Germany

Corporatism was also inseparable from the political systems in the UK and the US though, wasn't it?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. junke+AW[view] [source] 2020-06-02 12:31:58
>>depend+tF
The reply said "corporatism and fascism" can both exist, not "corporatism implies fascism".
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. depend+OR1[view] [source] 2020-06-02 17:47:11
>>junke+AW
This is what it means. It is a reply to "America doesn't have any serious fascist groups - from what I can tell the ruling powers are decidedly corporatist" after all.
[go to top]