zlacker

[return to "The business of tear gas"]
◧
1. splitr+f5[view] [source] 2020-06-02 15:25:02
>>hhs+(OP)
Tear gas is a chemical weapon and as such is banned in war according to the Geneva Conventions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/08/1...

◧◩
2. oicu81+A5[view] [source] 2020-06-02 15:27:03
>>splitr+f5
The article states, "It also lives in a legal gray zone, due to international treaties that allow it to be used in domestic law enforcement but not in war."
◧◩◪
3. geogra+S5[view] [source] 2020-06-02 15:28:07
>>oicu81+A5
Right - that seems horribly wrong. It shouldn't be allowed for law enforcement either.
◧◩◪◨
4. eitlan+87[view] [source] 2020-06-02 15:33:12
>>geogra+S5
Do you have a suggestion for a better way to achieve the same results?

(Of course we can discuss if most of the uses of tear gas are wrong, but lets for a moment think that we have a moment were we need to chase away a crowd of evil persons riotong and threatening to kill perfectly innocent children.)

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. tehweb+ji[view] [source] 2020-06-02 16:24:41
>>eitlan+87
I’m not sure if you’re aware but the police is the group that keeps murdering innocent children
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. eitlan+tm[view] [source] 2020-06-02 16:46:28
>>tehweb+ji
I was responding to this statement:

> Right - that seems horribly wrong. It shouldn't be allowed for law enforcement either.

I'm not trying to discuss if the police are doing the right thing, only te correct way of applying force.

[go to top]