zlacker

[return to "White nationalist group posing as antifa called for violence on Twitter"]
1. 0xy+9p[view] [source] 2020-06-02 06:26:26
>>aspenm+(OP)
Note that while this particular account was fake, real Antifa groups were organizing to attack those areas, according to multiple police sources. [1]

Disinformation campaigns don't mean all such activity is by political shills.

[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/law-enfo...

◧◩
2. craigm+mq[view] [source] 2020-06-02 06:37:44
>>0xy+9p
Antifa is not a single organized group, it's anyone who is anti-fascist. So there is no 'real' antifa groups. The police don't have a very good track record releasing truthful information regarding these events, so why not chill out before drawing your own outrageous conclusions.
◧◩◪
3. keving+vq[view] [source] 2020-06-02 06:39:00
>>craigm+mq
It would be fair to say that there are anti-fascist groups - many of them. It's just utterly non-factual to claim that "antifa" is an organized group, let alone some sort of terrorist organization. At best it's lots of small organizations with some common goals and iconography, and many of them have differing opinions and practices
◧◩◪◨
4. 0xy+Oq[view] [source] 2020-06-02 06:41:48
>>keving+vq
Who claimed "antifa" is a singular organized group?

The KKK has multiple independent sects and semi-decentralized governance, but that doesn't mean "KKK" doesn't exist -- it refers to all of them collectively.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. keving+2r[view] [source] 2020-06-02 06:43:53
>>0xy+Oq
The president did
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. 0xy+vr[view] [source] 2020-06-02 06:48:29
>>keving+2r
I'm sorry, but you're going to have to be specific. Saying "antifa" does not imply a singular group. The same way "KKK" does not imply a singular group.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. rudiv+Fx[view] [source] 2020-06-02 07:52:29
>>0xy+vr
If you'd checked the example you rely upon further down you'd have seen that in fact the individual Al-Qaeda groups are listed specifically in the State Department's listed of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. Now obviously I don't have the authority to say why that is, but it seems reasonable to presume that they are listed as separate organizations because they are, in fact, separate organizations.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. luckyl+9Y[view] [source] 2020-06-02 12:42:25
>>rudiv+Fx
Not necessarily. You don't want vague language in official documents, so you have to be specific, because you'd just shift the problem if you said "Al-Qaeda", since you now need an official list of Al-Qaeda-Subgroups.

If it would allow nesting, I'm pretty sure somebody would've already accidentally put Al-Qaeda under Ansar al-Sunna and cause a recursion error, blowing up DC.

[go to top]