zlacker

[return to "Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”"]
1. partia+uY[view] [source] 2020-05-29 15:16:17
>>danso+(OP)
Twitter is well within the rights to do this, but I have seen tweets from blue check marks essentially calling for violence and Twitter didn't remove them. So, does that mean Twitter actually -supports- those view points now? If Twitter is going to police people, it needs to be across the board. Otherwise it's just a weird censorship that is targeting one person and can easily be seen as political.

Everyone is applauding this because they hate Trump, but take a step back and see the bigger picture. This could backfire in serious ways, and it plays to Trump's base's narrative that the mainstream media and tech giants are colluding to silence conservatives (and maybe there could even be some truth to that.) I know the Valley is an echo chamber, so obviously no one is going to ever realize this.

◧◩
2. jtbayl+I61[view] [source] 2020-05-29 15:50:24
>>partia+uY
I'm just going to say again that I can't for the life of me understand why people are in agreement that this tweet glorifies violence. It is a call to stop being violent lest violence increase.

Looting always leads to shooting. This is a simple fact.

I'm horrified that so many people think me saying that is glorifying violence. I don't understand it in the slightest. Seeing this tweet by Trump get silenced absolutely convinces me that there is a conspiracy. Not so much against the right, but against truth.

◧◩◪
3. dmode+081[view] [source] 2020-05-29 15:55:43
>>jtbayl+I61
You should read up on the history of the phrase "when looting starts, shooting starts"
◧◩◪◨
4. koheri+9b1[view] [source] 2020-05-29 16:06:33
>>dmode+081
I read up on it's use in 1967. ...and it didn't really add anything. Looting leads to police/national guard having to restore order through violence.

There's no hidden meaning here.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. thethe+5o1[view] [source] 2020-05-29 17:01:57
>>koheri+9b1
It was used by a racist police chief in reference to black protesters during the _civil rights movement_, which I think we can all agree is on the right side of history. The parallels are pretty clear to me, I’m not sure what you are missing here
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. will42+pr1[view] [source] 2020-05-29 17:17:14
>>thethe+5o1
The fact that the police chief was racist doesn't make him wrong. He can be both racist and correct that looting generally leads to shooting.
[go to top]