zlacker

[return to "Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”"]
1. pagane+D1[view] [source] 2020-05-29 07:40:54
>>danso+(OP)
I said it yesterday and got downvotes, Twitter’s CEO decided to pick sides in the political battle so they should expect what’s coming to them.
◧◩
2. rootlo+02[view] [source] 2020-05-29 07:42:47
>>pagane+D1
Fact checking doesn't imply picking sides. Not fact checking does.
◧◩◪
3. xpaqui+me[view] [source] 2020-05-29 09:40:12
>>rootlo+02
Can you explain how not fact checking implies picking a side?
◧◩◪◨
4. rootlo+fh[view] [source] 2020-05-29 10:11:19
>>xpaqui+me
No fact check = implicit trust
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. moojd+bE[view] [source] 2020-05-29 13:21:24
>>rootlo+fh
Not fact checking is only picking a side once you have decided to fact check. Before all of this twitter could claim to be a medium of communication. There isn't implicit trust that something is true because it is written on paper, posted on a billboard, or appears on TV. By choosing to mark tweets as true or false, they are no longer just a medium of communication. We can now imply that if twitter does not mark a tweet as false, they are endorsing that tweet as true.
[go to top]