zlacker

[return to "Wikimedia enacts new standards to address harassment and promote inclusivity"]
1. travis+jo[view] [source] 2020-05-26 10:10:48
>>elsewh+(OP)
The irony in this is that this type of language about "inclusivity" only really appeals to a narrow subset of upper middle class white people.
◧◩
2. iron00+Z01[view] [source] 2020-05-26 14:31:38
>>travis+jo
You will be quickly disabused of this notion if you talk to poor and/or brown people. While I’m sure that you can find occasional individuals who do not care about inclusivity, the large majority do care.

The attitude that your comment reflects crops up a lot in relation to, for example, the Washington Redskins naming controversy. Folks who like the current name are always bringing up a couple of examples of Native Americans who say they “don’t care” about the name, and claiming that it’s really only white liberals who are offended; meanwhile, in my experience, the large majority of Natives actually do care very much, and are upset that a racial slur used for their ethnicity is being used as the name of a sports team.

◧◩◪
3. DuskSt+Qe1[view] [source] 2020-05-26 15:36:43
>>iron00+Z01
> The attitude that your comment reflects crops up a lot in relation to, for example, the Washington Redskins naming controversy. Folks who like the current name are always bringing up a couple of examples of Native Americans who say they “don’t care” about the name, and claiming that it’s really only white liberals who are offended; meanwhile, in my experience, the large majority of Natives actually do care very much, and are upset that a racial slur used for their ethnicity is being used as the name of a sports team.

I found this comment rather funny, because if CGP Grey is correct [0] the preferred term by American Indians is "American Indian", NOT "Native American". So you're claiming knowledge of the general opinion of a group, while not using the group's preferred name for themselves.

0: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kh88fVP2FWQ

[go to top]