zlacker

[return to "Tell HN: Interviewed with Triplebyte? Your profile is about to become public"]
1. gansty+u5[view] [source] 2020-05-23 05:29:35
>>winsto+(OP)
This is horrible, what a breach of trust. I used TB to stealthily interview for jobs, had a good experience. Recommended them to others. Now I see that if I hadn't seen this post, I wouldn't have known about this and those details would have been public, which had the potential to seriously undermine me at my current position. I'll opt out tomorrow, but according to others it sounds like the visibility link was somewhat hidden. At least with this they're well on the way to becoming the next LinkedIn, at least by their practices. What a dark pattern.
◧◩
2. ammon+Pa[view] [source] 2020-05-23 06:36:03
>>gansty+u5
Your Triplebyte profile will NOT contain any data/details about you or your job search that will undermine you at your current employer. We should have included a screenshot and more details in the email. I'll talk to my team about following up with more details tomorrow. We are talking about a lightweight profile, like your Stack Overflow or HN profile, to provide us the canvas to release badges. That's it.
◧◩◪
3. prox+Po[view] [source] 2020-05-23 09:09:34
>>ammon+Pa
Still, please don’t do things that need actual consent in IRL (making something that was private, public)

If your new service is of true benefit, it will be used.

◧◩◪◨
4. pmille+Np[view] [source] 2020-05-23 09:17:27
>>prox+Po
What makes you think anything on your TripleByte profile was ever "private." It was not. It was merely hidden from the majority of the world. If you have a TripleByte profile, presumably, at some point, you were job hunting, and likely advertising that fact to anyone you thought could help you.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. JadeNB+6D[view] [source] 2020-05-23 12:08:51
>>pmille+Np
> What makes you think anything on your TripleByte profile was ever "private." It was not. It was merely hidden from the majority of the world. If you have a TripleByte profile, presumably, at some point, you were job hunting, and likely advertising that fact to anyone you thought could help you.

Are you arguing for this change? Whatever the argument is seems to be based on misinterpreting 'private' as 'known by no-one else'. Exactly the same argument could apply to e-mail: it's not private in the sense that no-one else sees it, just hidden from the majority of the world; presumably, when you sent it, you were advertising what it said to the recipient.

[go to top]