zlacker

[return to "Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?"]
1. vmcept+Yu[view] [source] 2020-04-26 23:17:02
>>qqqqqu+(OP)
Has someone that thought they were taking LSD ever turned into a permanent schizophrenic zombie or in a mental institution, or is it all urban legend. If someone that didn't know they were predisposed to mental illness, is it applicable to dismiss their experience in order to maintain how safe LSD is?

If any of this is true, are there any sources aside from "my friend's friend's brother took too much and now he is....", and what is the scientific explanation and do we know enough about the mind at all?

I feel like LSD has a lot of contradictory information out there, and the proponents feel the need to hand waive concerns away because it is 'completely harmless and leaves your system in 10 hours'. But when nobody knows what they're actually getting because it doesn't exist in a legal framework, then it muddies the whole experience.

People say certain doses can't do more effect than lower doses after a certain threshold. It seems like the same people say "omg man 1000ug you are going to fry your brain!"

What is the truth? If it "just" had an FDA warning like "people with a family history of schizophrenia should not take it", that would be wildly better than what we have today.

Please no explanation about shrooms. Just LSD the 'research chems' distributed as LSD.

◧◩
2. logics+AR[view] [source] 2020-04-27 03:22:13
>>vmcept+Yu
The answer to this is really easy. Go to any mental institution and get to know the patients. An institution where they are allowed out, but are still in an enclosed area. A majority of the patients will have had some sort of heavy drug use in their past. Sure, whats causation and whats correlation, but its pretty clear that drugs cause mental breaks.

How do I know this?

I have mental illness in my family and have spent considerable amounts of time at those facilities.

◧◩◪
3. Erlich+Kg1[view] [source] 2020-04-27 09:01:13
>>logics+AR
> Sure, whats causation and whats correlation, but its pretty clear

What? How is it clear? As you wrote yourself, correlation is not causation.

◧◩◪◨
4. logics+sG1[view] [source] 2020-04-27 13:47:28
>>Erlich+Kg1
I was just protecting against the inevitable counter argument. The proof is what I have seen with my own two eyes
[go to top]