zlacker

>>claude+(OP)
I wonder what their recruiting team thinks about these moves by the company. I know I will not work for Amazon seeing how the manage dissent at the company and I’m sure there are many other people who feel the same.

>>gryzzl+ch
The cynic in me thinks that for any number of potential candidates who feel the same, there are exponentially more candidates that just want to work there regardless, and the recruiting team knows this.

>>strong+mi
They could be alienating vastly more people than that. However, they only need to higher a tiny fraction of the US workforce each year. So, it’s still not a significant issue.

>>Retric+Wl
Their pool is not the entire US workforce, it's a relatively small group of highly skilled workers in a market where those workers can make tons of money at many different companies.

Alienating a fraction of that workforce will impact them, I think.

>>static+gt
Warehouse workers are not highly skilled. But, even if you’re talking just say programmers they still employ less than 1% of us.

>>Retric+aT
I am referring to programmers, and specifically a subset of programmers that can pass a difficult interview - most developers are absolutely terrible, probably > 50%, so cut that number in half at least. It's a relatively small number.

>>static+m41
You can cut 90% of programmers that would not pass an interview for whatever reason and there are still easily 10 times more people that qualify than work for Amazon. More so if you consider whatever fraction they need to onboard each year. Absolutely worst case is just slightly increase pay or open a few more offices across the US.

>>Retric+Hp1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering_demograph...

612k engineers. Let's assume that Amazon aims to hire the top 20% (I would expect software engineering skills to follow a power curve), so roughly 100k qualified workers.

That's pretty small if you're looking to employ 2-5k of them. That's a lot of competition given that there are likely at least 50 companies making Amazon-type offers.

I'm not saying they can't hire people if 10% of that pool decides they won't work there, but I'd imagine they would want to extend their pool to maybe top 30% at some point.