zlacker

[return to "Tell HN: Launch HN Test"]
1. Hitton+g3[view] [source] 2020-04-03 08:45:51
>>gruseo+(OP)
I'll use this as an opportunity to ask something.

Are there any stats how many active users does HN have, on how many servers it runs, on which database etc.?

Because I have recently wanted to look at my older saved/upvoted posts/comments on reddit and found out that you can look only at last 1000 posts and it does various other things to save resources. HN doesn't seem to do things like that and still feels much snappier than reddit (yes reddit has much more users, but still impressive imho).

◧◩
2. dang+E4[view] [source] 2020-04-03 09:04:45
>>Hitton+g3
Reddit is a hundred times bigger. It's not just that we aren't in their league...our league is not in their league. So the comparison is a little embarrassing.

It's hard to count active users because you have to define them in order to count them, and we make a point of not tracking people that much. We can count accounts and unique IPs, and that's about it. But it's basically about 5M readers a month, give or take, as far as we can tell. It grows linearly, with large swings. If you step back 10 feet from the graphs and squint, it's basically a straight line for the last 10 years. We like it that way; we wouldn't want to go full Haskell and avoid success at all costs, but we don't want hockey-stick growth either. HN is not a startup!

It runs on one server. Actually the app server (written in Arc) runs on one core. But we have some caching in front of that for logged-out users.

◧◩◪
3. bor0+0j[view] [source] 2020-04-03 12:06:30
>>dang+E4
> we wouldn't want to go full Haskell and avoid success at all costs

Can you elaborate on that statement? To me, it implies that going with Haskell avoids success, but I might be missing something. If that really is the implication, can you explain?

◧◩◪◨
4. SAI_Pe+vK[view] [source] 2020-04-03 15:13:40
>>bor0+0j
To me it means that the Haskell project is strictly an academic experiment and seems to avoid mainstream success for itself at all costs. Not that projects using it can't achieve success, just that it'll never be popular and tries very hard not to be, though not really with that intent.
[go to top]