zlacker

>>perfun+(OP)
I know a guy who works at Amazon. The person who spammed the internal email list soliciting participants for this is no longer at the company.

Survey sent in the email: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZSJH2G3

>>throwa+J2
> The person who spammed the internal email list soliciting participants for this is no longer at the company.

I could understand this from the AMZN shareholders point of view: as an employee of the company you are paid to defend private interests, not public interests.

>>krn+Y4
> as an employee of the company you are paid to defend private interests, not public interests

So all that "stakeholder capitalism" recent discussion was pure BS? [1]

[1] https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/larry...

>>pagane+57
That should come from the top, not from the bottom of the company. It's not the responsibility of a lower level employee to define what his company stands for. Everyone is free to work for a company that matches his values.

>>krn+Z8
Your customers might be interested in what your "lower level employees" think.