zlacker

[return to "The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News"]
1. lucb1e+Ep[view] [source] 2019-08-08 14:01:49
>>lordna+(OP)
Has anyone ever seen an online community (with more than a handful of users) that focuses on more than cute puppy pictures and that is not described as "toxic" by "critics"? I'd say that HN does a great job at avoiding that. The article is titled "moderating hacker news" but fails to describe just how good a job the moderators and owners are doing. The moderators for moderation, and the owners for (as I perceive it) giving the moderators the freedom to try things that are best for the community (such as the politics-free experiment).
◧◩
2. Tiktaa+CS[view] [source] 2019-08-08 17:19:40
>>lucb1e+Ep
Traditional forums are usually strictly moderated and are not toxic. (eg. Resetera, Somethingawful)
◧◩◪
3. astran+L42[view] [source] 2019-08-09 03:11:12
>>Tiktaa+CS
On SA the mods were the toxic people. Do you remember Helldump? It was a forum dedicated to stalking random users and getting them banned by proving they weren't cool enough in real life to get to hang out on SA.

I think one reason for this is that to be a mod, you needed to have tons of free time and be friends with the admins already.

[go to top]