zlacker

[return to "On SQS"]
1. cyberf+2b[view] [source] 2019-05-27 09:02:28
>>mpweih+(OP)
We've used SQS with great results (and reliability) for many years now, but I am interested to hear the author talking about 'replaying queues' to replicate faults. I never realised you could do this with SQS. Or can you? I thought once a queue item was processed and deleted, that was it, it was gone forever, but perhaps you can see historical queue data somewhere? (without having to store it yourself)
◧◩
2. ilogik+Lc[view] [source] 2019-05-27 09:28:10
>>cyberf+2b
maybe once you've processed a message, you resend it to a different queue, just in case?
◧◩◪
3. cyberf+Jp[view] [source] 2019-05-27 12:11:11
>>ilogik+Lc
That's actually a neat idea. Since we don't have to pay for number of items in a queue, I am thinking we could create a dummy queue and just handball all incoming messages to it for safekeeping (at least for 14 days)?!?
◧◩◪◨
4. kondro+nt2[view] [source] 2019-05-28 12:32:41
>>cyberf+Jp
Or send everything to SNS and have two SQS queues subscribed to the topic.
[go to top]