zlacker

[return to "Most of What We Read on the Internet is Written by Insane People"]
1. gniv+pB[view] [source] 2019-01-11 15:31:05
>>unquot+(OP)
Most of the comments here are either elaborating on the OP, or justify lurking. I am a mostly-lurker myself, but I felt the need to comment here, since I was hoping to see the discussion go into a different direction.

The OP uses the word "insane", not outlier. It's clickbaity, and used in jest, but I think it better captures a subtlety of this phenomenon: The prolific commenters are molding every discussion in their image. They might have an interesting angle on the story, or they might just be saying trivial things with beautiful prose. In any case, there is a lack of diversity in general -- discussions are driven by the worldview of a few.

That would be an argument for lurkers to make an effort, even if, like this comment, it's just a barely-formed idea.

Edit: "molding the discussion" -> "molding every discussion"

◧◩
2. cholmo+6G[view] [source] 2019-01-11 16:11:07
>>gniv+pB
This parallels civic/political engagement in real life.

It's tough to get lurkers (like me) to speak up and shift the discussion when the emotional cost of doing so - arguing, being downvoted, getting defensive, being ridiculed - seems to make the effort simply not worthwhile for the individual. Not only on the web, but also in the office, at Thanksgiving dinner, at a cookout, etc.

◧◩◪
3. redwar+EV[view] [source] 2019-01-11 18:04:13
>>cholmo+6G
This reminds me of when I attempt to send a Snopes link to someone who just forwarded me a chain email. They don't thank you, you get silence or worse.
◧◩◪◨
4. adrian+Y51[view] [source] 2019-01-11 19:19:08
>>redwar+EV
Silence from people who forward chain mails seems desireable.
[go to top]