zlacker

>>jashke+(OP)
Imagine belonging to an expert, seasoned team that masters a given technique. Literally the worldwide top 1% for that technique works under your roof.

You don't take feature development lightly: each feature will be discussed and polished patiently within your team. And then you release it, for free.

Then semi-random people from the internet want to continue the discussions that were settled privately long ago, while also demonstrating this entitlement.

I guess that can be a maddening, constant stream of noise. One that cannot be dismissed harshly - you may be an expert, but definitely don't want to scare people off.

Kudos to the Clojure core team for resisting the stream in a classy, illuminating manner.

>>vemv+U6
yeah, thats important, but its also not whats happening here. This is an argument between people who've contributed a great deal to clojure and clojures ultimate authority. Which is completely different then entitled randos drive-by commenting and demanding accommodation.