zlacker

>>infodr+(OP)
Lerna was released with an MIT license as was Rush.

So, nothing was stolen and if the story is true, the only infraction here would be that the Lerna copyright line was not included in the Rush license.

>>hunger+1b
This sounds dangerously like "oh, it was open-source code, so it's not so bad they violated it's license". I strongly disagree with that.