zlacker

[return to "In Twitter’s early days, only one celebrity could tweet at a time"]
1. gringo+Hw[view] [source] 2018-05-24 23:32:23
>>evanwe+(OP)
This isn't shocking - Twitter was notorious for being held together with Scotch tape technically.

Honestly this hands-on approach is an impressive example of doing things that don't scale.

◧◩
2. gianca+1x[view] [source] 2018-05-24 23:38:58
>>gringo+Hw
I found it amusing that Twitter was Rails' biggest advertisement. Everyone wanted to use Rails but Twitter turned into a franken app with different stacks to keep it running
◧◩◪
3. phaedr+ay[view] [source] 2018-05-24 23:51:53
>>gianca+1x
Twitter was Rails' worst advertisement. They used Rails as a scapegoat to hide their bad tech. I still hear things like "Rails can't scale; remember Twitter?"
◧◩◪◨
4. jensvd+yE[view] [source] 2018-05-25 01:25:27
>>phaedr+ay
Airbnb is still on rails.. Probably the largest rails app out there for now.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Jagat+9G[view] [source] 2018-05-25 01:47:46
>>jensvd+yE
Except that I'd bet Airbnb's read qps requirement is less than 1% of Twitter's. Write qps would be even smaller.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. MBCook+wI[view] [source] 2018-05-25 02:22:03
>>Jagat+9G
True, but on an absolute scale AirBNB is still very big.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. segmon+sJ1[view] [source] 2018-05-25 14:33:30
>>MBCook+wI
I don't think so. Seriously think about it. How many active users does AirBnB have? How many put their home up for rent, and how many rent in a year? I reckon you get more tweets in a day than AirBnB rentals in a year. That's how big Twitter is or small AirBnB is. :D
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. MBCook+eb3[view] [source] 2018-05-26 01:42:31
>>segmon+sJ1
Twitter was bigger but they don’t run on Rails anymore where I gather AirBNB does.
[go to top]