zlacker

[return to "In Twitter’s early days, only one celebrity could tweet at a time"]
1. gringo+Hw[view] [source] 2018-05-24 23:32:23
>>evanwe+(OP)
This isn't shocking - Twitter was notorious for being held together with Scotch tape technically.

Honestly this hands-on approach is an impressive example of doing things that don't scale.

◧◩
2. gianca+1x[view] [source] 2018-05-24 23:38:58
>>gringo+Hw
I found it amusing that Twitter was Rails' biggest advertisement. Everyone wanted to use Rails but Twitter turned into a franken app with different stacks to keep it running
◧◩◪
3. evanwe+D41[view] [source] 2018-05-25 08:03:43
>>gianca+1x
Rails, and the way it used MySQL/Postgres, was designed for building CMSs. Very amenable to CDN caching to scale.

Twitter was a realtime messaging platform (fundamentally not edge-cacheable) that evolved from that CMS foundation. So the reason for the difficult evolution should be clear.

It's not really a coincidence that before Twitter I worked at CNET on Urbanbaby.com which was also a realtime, threaded, short message web chat implemented in Rails.

Anyway the point is: use my new project/company https://fauna.com/ to scale your operational data. :-)

◧◩◪◨
4. Operyl+O51[view] [source] 2018-05-25 08:21:20
>>evanwe+D41
I take it from a quick glance: you either own/work for Fauna and it’s a completely proprietary product? If so .. I’ll pass, I like building things atop stuff I can control. :)
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. evanwe+k61[view] [source] 2018-05-25 08:26:52
>>Operyl+O51
Yes, it's not open source (for now). Managed cloud and on-premises edition. We will have a free download soon.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Operyl+t61[view] [source] 2018-05-25 08:28:50
>>evanwe+k61
Might I suggest disclosing it when you post about it? Clicking through your profile revealed it, but it seems like it could read off better for you in the future. :)

EDIT: either it was edited above, or I’m blind. I think it was the earlier?

[go to top]