zlacker

>>grabeh+(OP)
Constantly trying to whitewash over the fact that GPDR is a huge pain in the ass and will involve a lot of work for a lot of companies is what I don't understand, but Mr. Mattheij has been doing it for months, so that's evidently very important to him for some reason.

It's chewed up a few weeks of active development time putting in features for purging and exporting anything that looks like it might be personal information, plus a considerable magnitude more hemming and hawing and trying to figure out if, how and to what extent the regulations apply to us, and how the customers that we sell our products interpret the regulations and what features they require for their interpretation of compliance. It's a big headache, especially where we are also dealing in industries that have conflicting data retention requirements.

If we didn't have EU-based customers with sufficient sales to justify the effort, there are a thousand and one other things that we could have better spent that time and energy on.

>>megama+It
Of course there are 1001 things YOU deem more important. All that says to me is that your interests and priorities are not aligned with how people in the EU want their data handled.

The WHOLE POINT of GDPR is that many companies have continually pushed PII data handling down their list of priorities. As a result, the EU has decided to step in and use a law to bring it back up the list.