zlacker

>>grabeh+(OP)
There's no hysteria. There's just FUD disinformation campaign - businesses who make a lot of money thanks to privacy violations are very unhappy with this and they have a lot of voices.

>>glogla+N4
I'm unhappy with this because now I have to do a lot of extra work verifying that I'm not breaking some law, then implement changes in both code and license agreements, then get all the users to agree.

I've had zero profit from user data so far - to the contrary. If everyone could be billed just with some cryptocurrency, totally anonymous, that would be great.

>>horseL+ub
The only thing I can do as a customer is be mildly amused at the fact that you're complaining it's inconvenient for you to respect my privacy now that a law is coming into effect forcing you to do so.

From the other end of the spectrum, I know you're wildly exaggerating the difficulty of compliance.