zlacker

[return to "GDPR: Don't Panic"]
1. raquo+e2[view] [source] 2018-05-18 08:28:05
>>grabeh+(OP)
The problem of multiple ambiguities in GDPR hasn't really been addressed here.

Also, must be nice to live in a country where the regulator is as benevolent and reasonable as is described in this article.

I think it's ok for foreigners to be skeptical of this promise, as the article implies that this reasonableness is not encoded in law.

◧◩
2. Angost+D4[view] [source] 2018-05-18 08:55:19
>>raquo+e2
> The problem of multiple ambiguities in GDPR hasn't really been addressed here.

Such as?

> Also, must be nice to live in a country where the regulator is as benevolent and reasonable as is described in this article.

It is, thanks.

◧◩◪
3. raquo+86[view] [source] 2018-05-18 09:13:25
>>Angost+D4
OTOH

- Scope outside of Europe – e.g. if a completely foreign entity that offers a Spanish or French translation of its service could potentially be covered by GDPR, even if they're not marketing to EU markets specifically. Too bad for Quebec I guess. Or what if you fly to speak at a conference in Europe – is that "marketing" to residents of EU? Depends on your slides? Or not? Who knows.

- Consent – does X fall under "legitimate interest"? Is it essential to providing the service? These are not easy to definitively answer for any non-trivial application. And it's not like you can just err on the side of caution – you are not allowed to ask for more consent than you need IIRC. And if the regulator (one of them) disagrees with you after you've spent a few years building a business relying on a certain interpretation, tough luck I guess, try again?

- How to deal with backups that contain personal information

[go to top]