zlacker

>>pavel_+(OP)
> If we look at major commercial databases today, two out of the three big names in commericial databases forbid publishing benchmarks.

I see many people bashing Oracle/Ellison, but they are not alone in this. MS does the same thing as well. The really worrying thing is that such practices are deemed to be legal. The entire principle of Free Markets is underpinned by consumers having accurate information about the goods they are purchasing. Having licensing agreements that are expressly designed to prevent the dissemination of product-information, goes against everything that Capitalism and Free-Markets stand for.

The fact that there are no government regulations against such behavior, is precisely what leads people to think that we are living in a Corporatocracy, and not a Free Market.

>>whack+2d
The starting point of basic contract law is that we can choose what we want the terms of a contract to be.

If either party doesn't like the terms of a proposed contract, they can just not execute that contract.

If you don't want to agree to the Oracle license then don't agree to the Oracle license. It's pretty simple.

The market will react to this. Oracle is still really popular, but open source databases are cutting into the market.

To me, that sounds like the free market in action.