zlacker

>>codero+(OP)
The long-term solution is simply not to work anywhere that insists on running a MITM attack on all of your communications.

>>db48x+D2
I'm sure the students of the Montgomery County, Maryland public school system, who are affected by this problem, will take your advice into consideration when submitting resumes to other public schools.

>>stonog+64
They should lobby the school board not to do this nonsense.

>>x1798D+F5
The Board doesn't have a choice, under CIPA[0], content filtering is a requirement for the FCC's E-Rate program[1] in which the government pays some of the cost of the school's internet connection.

[0]https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/childrens-internet-prot...

[1]https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service-program-school...

>>bgc+Q6
Of course they have a choice. It's not very princinpled to sell your children's online privacy in exchange for some "grant" money going to an oppressive-dictatorship supporting company like BlueCoat.

(Also it's possible can do server address based blocking without MITM)