zlacker

[return to "A Report on the Flawed 2016 Democratic Primaries"]
1. vannev+dV[view] [source] 2016-07-27 16:46:44
>>Damien+(OP)
I think the most interesting (and perhaps hopeful) aspect here is that people now have an expectation of fairness in the selection of party candidates. That's a relatively new phenomenon. In the past, I think people widely assumed that the party was biased towards individual candidates. Even now, that's clearly the case when the sitting President is a candidate. I personally think that expecting an unbiased party structure is unrealistic, given the very nature of the organization. The party doesn't have a product, other than its opinion. The idea that an organization of partisans only arrives at that collective opinion through primaries and caucuses seems quite naive to me.
◧◩
2. Ericso+dc1[view] [source] 2016-07-27 18:35:59
>>vannev+dV
I'm sympathetic, but without a parliamentary system the US cannot have an effective market of political parties. And without such a market, primaries need to be democratic.
◧◩◪
3. xenoph+do1[view] [source] 2016-07-27 20:15:16
>>Ericso+dc1
I'm not sure a parliamentary system is necessary. Instead, I think we need to make three reforms:

- non-partisan redistricting

- instant runoff voting

- automatic voter registration

◧◩◪◨
4. Ericso+r92[view] [source] 2016-07-28 08:37:04
>>xenoph+do1
Is instant runoff like ranked choice?
[go to top]