zlacker

>>lkrubn+(OP)
That title is over the top, so we replaced it with the much more neutral first sentence of the article.

>>dang+mg
yeah, agreed with Candelabra - that title got lots of upvotes and was what it was

>>colinm+ij
The problem is that such titles routinely get upvotes, presumably because of some reflex they trigger in the brain. If we want to have a site that gratifies intellectual curiosity—which we do—we have no choice but to counteract them. That's a fundamental principle of this place.