zlacker

>>lkrubn+(OP)
That title is over the top, so we replaced it with the much more neutral first sentence of the article.

>>dang+mg
this isn't OK. It's not HN's place to change the title because they disagree with it, or because it's harsh. If the original article changed the title, then there would be justification. But they didn't, so HN has no business injecting their editorialization into it.