zlacker

>>syness+(OP)
This issue always boils down to the LOTR argument for me: the surveillance power is too great, and no individual or group can or should be trusted with it, regardless of its actual current or potential future benefits.

The crux of the debate then is where to draw the line between safe and unsafe amounts of power?

>>jkonow+Hc
It's not the amount of power that makes it unsafe, but rather its nature. In order for it to be safe:

1. It must be granted through democratic means.

2. It must be under strict oversight by an independently elected or appointed group that's free from both private conflict of interest and popular pressure.

3. There must be reliable mechanisms to quickly and efficiently strip said power away from the authority if they are determined to have used it irresponsibly.