zlacker

[return to "Paris Shootings and Explosions Kill Over 100, Police Say"]
1. djfm+74[view] [source] 2015-11-14 01:12:06
>>franzb+(OP)
I live in Paris and was spending the night in the middle of the hot zone. I was a few hundred meters from the Bataclan but fortunately the area I was in was spared. I tried to get a Uber but they were unavailable, "State of emergency, please stay home", the app said. I took a city bike home, rode about 10kms and barely saw anyone in the streets all the way home. It was really, really weird. I'm awfully sad that people can be proud of having killed a hundred innocents. I'm not afraid, I'm just terribly sad. Please stop this pointless killing.
◧◩
2. bedhea+U4[view] [source] 2015-11-14 01:21:50
>>djfm+74
You are trying to rationalize with people who are irrational. They don't reconcile. It sucks. It's depressing.
◧◩◪
3. beniha+Rc[view] [source] 2015-11-14 03:42:14
>>bedhea+U4
>You are trying to rationalize with people who are irrational.

In my opinion, this is the most dangerous statement in this thread. Saying the actions of these people is irrational loses any ability to understand why they're doing what they're doing and how we can stop them. It turns them into a faceless enemy who are doing things because of hate, which is easy and makes my ego feel better, but doesn't really explain their actions or the actions of anyone. Nobody thinks they're the bad guy of their own story.

There is nothing more rational than terrorizing civilians to achieve a goal. It is the logical conclusion of rationality.

◧◩◪◨
4. myegor+eh[view] [source] 2015-11-14 05:30:58
>>beniha+Rc
I agree that with asymmetrical warfare resorting to terrorism is rational. What seems irrational is our inability to recognize the struggle of our enemy for what it's worth and our refusal to negotiate. I can't think of an example where negotiations (as in granting that your partner in negotiations is your peer) haven't led to a net positive outcome. To take but one example close to home: The Soviet Union was founded by a terrorist group. The ultimate recognition of the state by western powers and their foreign policy of engagement -- aside from the Cold War era -- was instrumental in bringing the enemy to its knees (whatever the wider repercussions of this outcome).
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. oh_sig+ao[view] [source] 2015-11-14 09:09:09
>>myegor+eh
How about chamberlains negotiations with Hitler?
[go to top]