zlacker

[return to "Paris Shootings and Explosions Kill Over 100, Police Say"]
1. djfm+74[view] [source] 2015-11-14 01:12:06
>>franzb+(OP)
I live in Paris and was spending the night in the middle of the hot zone. I was a few hundred meters from the Bataclan but fortunately the area I was in was spared. I tried to get a Uber but they were unavailable, "State of emergency, please stay home", the app said. I took a city bike home, rode about 10kms and barely saw anyone in the streets all the way home. It was really, really weird. I'm awfully sad that people can be proud of having killed a hundred innocents. I'm not afraid, I'm just terribly sad. Please stop this pointless killing.
◧◩
2. bedhea+U4[view] [source] 2015-11-14 01:21:50
>>djfm+74
You are trying to rationalize with people who are irrational. They don't reconcile. It sucks. It's depressing.
◧◩◪
3. rquant+B5[view] [source] 2015-11-14 01:31:09
>>bedhea+U4
Terrorism is usually a rational act. It is terrible, but it has political goals. This, for instance, may be aimed at ending the European involvement in Syria and their taking in refugees.
◧◩◪◨
4. charle+Y5[view] [source] 2015-11-14 01:36:29
>>rquant+B5
> aimed at ending the European involvement in Syria

I would be quite surprised if the EU decided against further intervention by this. If anything, I would expect them to intervene more.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. jacque+C7[view] [source] 2015-11-14 02:00:32
>>charle+Y5
They should do neither and simply carry on with the plans they had to date. Any reaction beyond police action to find out what the chain of command is and then targeting those individuals specifically is playing into their hands.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. pistle+Gf[view] [source] 2015-11-14 04:52:06
>>jacque+C7
This presumes that playing into their hands would actually bring forth enough support to rebuff the reaction. If forces overwhelmingly squash the terrorist organization, then it doesn't matter if it plays into said organization's hands.

This isn't a game won by winning a debate. When one side can be essentially removed from the field, that is an option, even if the side being removed wanted that line of strategy to unfold. Controlling the plays doesn't mean you win the game.

Unbeknownst to me, I have a proclivity for alcoholism. I am libertarian during a prohibition and work to remove limitations on what, when, where, and how I imbibe. I am successful in deregulating alcohol... then I become alcoholic and die from liver failure... I WIN!

[go to top]