zlacker

[return to "Intel x86 considered harmful – survey of attacks against x86 over last 10 years"]
1. kragen+j5[view] [source] 2015-10-27 15:35:14
>>chei0a+(OP)
Probably worth pointing out that the author is the project lead of Qubes, one of the very few promising projects in the vast wasteland of computer security.
◧◩
2. kachnu+pl[view] [source] 2015-10-27 17:32:25
>>kragen+j5
Very few? Seriously?
◧◩◪
3. kragen+rq[view] [source] 2015-10-27 18:09:10
>>kachnu+pl
Seriously. The vast majority of computer security effort is wasted on things like the advisory-and-patch cycle, pen testing, and virus scanning, which can never, by their very nature, provide computer security. That's not to say you don't have to do them — it's just that they're not productive.
◧◩◪◨
4. kachnu+8B[view] [source] 2015-10-27 19:50:36
>>kragen+rq
Oh, I understand now and I agree wholeheartedly.

There's been some exciting progress in the formal verification department in recent years, though.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. kragen+HC[view] [source] 2015-10-27 20:06:01
>>kachnu+8B
I agree!
[go to top]