zlacker
[return to "Intel x86 considered harmful – survey of attacks against x86 over last 10 years"]
◧
1. n0us+l2
[view]
[source]
2015-10-27 15:13:48
>>chei0a+(OP)
I really could do without "considered harmful" titles. x86 has been one of the most influential technologies of all time and a clickbait title doesn't do it justice imo.
◧◩
2. wmil+P4
[view]
[source]
2015-10-27 15:31:50
>>n0us+l2
You should write a paper explaining your views. And title it "'Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful".
◧◩◪
3. pgeorg+Z4
[view]
[source]
2015-10-27 15:32:58
>>wmil+P4
> And title it "'Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful".
http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
[edit: clarified context]
[go to top]